![how many people are playing battlefield 1 how many people are playing battlefield 1](https://www.gamespot.com/a/uploads/original/1179/11799911/3168588-grenade.jpg)
NO WEAPON, VEHICLE OR GEAR MANUFACTURER IS AFFILIATED WITH OR HAS SPONSORED OR ENDORSED THIS GAME. Red Baron Pack, Lawrence of Arabia Pack and Hellfighter Pack – containing themed weapons, vehicles and emblems based on the famous heroes and units.Ĭheck often for details and release dates for each expansion pack. Fight as infantry or take control of amazing vehicles on land, air and sea.įour themed expansion packs with new multiplayer maps, new weapons and more. Discover a world at war through an adventure-filled campaign, or join in epic team-based multiplayer battles with up to 64 players. Battlefield 1 Revolution is the complete package containing:Įxperience the dawn of all-out war in Battlefield 1. Join the strong Battlefield community and jump into the epic battles of The Great War in this critically acclaimed first-person shooter. Gamescom Best Action Game award winner 2016 The beta wraps up tomorrow.Games Critics Awards Best of E3 2016: Best Action Game What do you think? Do you prefer the old Conquest system or the new? Or, don’t care? Slicing through an entire squad will never get old.
#HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE PLAYING BATTLEFIELD 1 REGISTRATION#
The hit registration is way too lenient, but I don’t care. Stampeding around on horse with a sabre is incredible. I don’t like change.Īt least it’s still fun. C’mon DICE, give us back the old Conquest. Or, maybe they wanted to put more emphasis on objectives? It’s still just a big version of Domination at this point. Swarm the battlefield in massive multiplayer battles with up to 64 players. What sparked the change?ĭid they want to simplify the mode to cater to casual players? How could anyone think old Conquest was complicated? Battlefield 1 takes you back to The Great War, WW1, where new technology. Battlefield’s Conquest has gone unchanged for years. Why DICE fixed something that isn’t broken, I’ll never understand. Sniping while moving throughout the map capturing objectives? I like you. Parked atop a rock or sand dune the whole match? You’re not helping. Depending on how they play, they’re pretty much worthless. Because kills don’t impact a ticket pool, people who play Snipers aren’t as useful. In fact, there is one thing I love (and hate depending on which team I’m on). That doesn’t mean I hate what DICE is doing in Battlefield 1. When kills counted against the ticket pool, a handful of players could single-handedly carry their team to victory.
![how many people are playing battlefield 1 how many people are playing battlefield 1](https://cdn.vox-cdn.com/thumbor/dhsWDBGdBsQLHb1nAEWjObpW7tA=/0x0:1920x1080/1200x675/filters:focal(661x0:967x306)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/62319807/battlefield_5_support_soldier_1920.0.jpg)
That’s still the case in Battlefield 1, but to a lesser extent. Two, a couple of good players could turn a match around quicker. One, it’s how I’ve played Conquest for years and I didn’t think anything was wrong with it. Now, which system do you prefer? I like the old-style Conquest. Granted, if you die a lot that means you’re not defending/capturing flags. Deaths don’t count against you like they do in the old Conquest. It’s pretty much a big ass game of Domination. Instead, both teams start at 0 and gain points by capturing flags.
![how many people are playing battlefield 1 how many people are playing battlefield 1](https://media.contentapi.ea.com/content/dam/bf/common/bf1-rev-logo-light-v2.png)
In Battlefield 1, DICE did away with the ticket system. Reviving a downed player saves that players’ ticket. The rate of the ticket loss is determined by how many flags are captured. And whoever controls the most flags bleeds tickets from the opposing team quicker. Let’s talk about how DICE changed Conquest in Battlefield 1 compared to previous Battlefield games.īefore, DICE used a ‘ticket’ system. With no timer, the matches are finally starting feeling similar to the Conquest of old. Another match lasted 32 minutes and was much tighter. The 21 minute match was a one-sided affair with my team winning 300-142. My matches last night ranged from 20 minutes to more than 30 minutes depending how close they were. If your team gets decimated in the first initial push towards the flags, it’s hard to recover in just 18 minutes.ĭitching the timer helps. And with the new changes made to Conquest, it feels like you need a lot more time to turn a match around. There just wasn’t enough time to mount a comeback. My biggest issue with the 18-minute Conquest was it was too short. It was more like 17 and change by the time everyone loaded the next match from the post-game screen.
![how many people are playing battlefield 1 how many people are playing battlefield 1](https://assets.vg247.com/current//2016/06/battlefield_1_faceoff1-600x338.jpg)
Before the change, matches lasted 18 minutes. I finally got a few games of Battlefield 1 Conquest in last night after DICE opted to remove the time limit.